Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jaime's avatar

God bless Jordan.

Expand full comment
Steven Umbrello's avatar

A fine introduction, and a fair one. Peterson’s work has done something few modern thinkers manage: he’s made moral seriousness contagious. His insight that meaning comes through responsibility, not self-expression, has struck deeper than any culture-war slogan ever could.

What stands out in his talks on Genesis and the Gospels is that he treats Scripture not as folklore or mere psychology but as a living grammar of being. When he says that civilization rests on voluntary sacrifice, he’s naming what the Christian tradition calls caritas, that is, love that bears the cost of the good. There’s a reason so many young people who start with Peterson end up reading Augustine, Aquinas, or even the Gospels themselves (talking also about myself). He’s re-opened the doorway between psychology and theology. In doing so, what he does is show that our moral life can’t survive without transcendence. The real question, as your conversation hints, is whether the logic of sacrifice can stand once the Cross is removed from it. Peterson circles that mystery with growing reverence. The task now is not to idolize the messenger but to follow where his questions point (even is the messenger doesnt go there) toward the source of meaning itself, where responsibility and grace meet.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?